Dérives dans les rues d’Abidjan : Les jeunes filles se promènent presque nues

Dérives dans les rues d’Abidjan : Les jeunes filles se promènent presque nues

Jupes ultra courtes, jean ras de fesse, décolletés rageurs, robes moulantes, collants, nombril dehors … L’habillement des jeunes filles dans les rues d’Abidjan dérange. De véritables atteintes à la pudeur auxquelles on assiste au quotidien. Au vu et au su de tous.

Atteinte à la pudeur dans les rues d’Abidjan. L’extravagance dans les tenues vestimentaires de la gente féminine a atteint des degrés inimaginables. Choquer pour plaire semble être la nouvelle devise de cette nouvelle race de jeunes filles sans foi ni loi qui écument au quotidien les rues de la capitale économique depuis les quartiers précaires jusque dans les endroits chics ou quartiers huppés.

« C’est la tendance en ce moment. Il faut choquer pour plaire et attirer les hommes. C’est ça la nouvelle tendance. Les hommes aiment beaucoup ça », nous révèle Bibi, gérante de maquis à Marcory. Vêtue d’un chemisier qui met en exergue sa poitrine et d’une jupe ultra courte, elle aiguise l’appétit de ses clients à chacun de ses passages entre les tables.

Dans les endroits publics, les parties intimes de certaines filles sont même visibles au travers de leur accoutrement. Jupes ultra courtes, décolletés rageurs, robes moulantes, collant, Cuisse et seins en exergues, ras de fesse, nombril dehors…

Choquer pour plaire

Au grand carrefour de Koumassi, comme au rond-point Siporex de Yopougon, à Adjamé 220 logements ou encore devant la mairie d’Abobo, c’est un défilé incessant de jeunes filles aux accoutrements qui défient toute logique auquel on assiste à longueur de journée.

« A chaque période son mode d’habillement. Nous ne pouvons pas nous habiller comme nos parents », se défend Aicha Koné, devant chez Hassan 220 logement d’Adjamé. Sa robe moulante attire tous les regards à son passage. Un scenario qui lui laisse chaque fois un sourire aux lèvres. Et chaque jour, on assiste à ces manières de s’habiller qui frisent l’indécence.

Chuchotements, rires, regards complices ne manquent pas lorsqu’une silhouette à l’accoutrement extravagante passe les rues. Selon Yebou George retraité « avec cette nouvelle manière de s’habiller, ce n’est plus la mode mais plutôt la dépravation des mœurs. Etre à la mode n’est pas synonyme d’extravagance ou d’indécence. Mais malheureusement c’est ce qu’on constate aujourd’hui. La manière de se vêtir est très importante.
C’est incompréhensible la manière dont nos filles s’habillent aujourd’hui. Nos mamans, avant, n’exposaient pas leur corps pour pouvoir avoir des maris. Bien au contraire, les hommes que nous sommes, recherchons de nos jours les femmes respectables », deplore-til.

Les jeunes filles ivoiriennes se promènent presque nues 2 Dérives dans les rues d’Abidjan : Les jeunes filles se promènent presque nues

Que dire encore de la tendance des ’’ collants’’ en vogue en ce moment, c’est la dérive totale. Selon ce sexagénaire, cela incombe aussi de la responsabilité des parents qui devraient avoir un certain regard sur l’accoutrement de leurs enfants. « Malheureusement, c’est le contraire aujourd’hui puisque certains parents même sont entretenus par leurs enfants. Donc ils ne peuvent pas leur donner des conseils », relève le vieil homme.

« La mode vestimentaire étant la manière de se vêtir, conformément au goût d’une époque, dans une région donnée ne signifie pas que nous devons y être assujettis si bien que ce n’est pas tout ce qui est à la mode qui nous sied le mieux. Il faut se vêtir en tenant compte de certains aspects dont la morphologie, les goûts, les envies et les préférences. Plus on évolue, plus la mode passe à une certaine dimension.

Démission des parents et Influence des telenovas

Donc nous devons toutefois rester nous même, dans notre nature. Car l’accoutrement reflète notre personnalité», indique Sarah Kouame, couturière modéliste. Selon notre interlocutrice, ces filles aujourd’hui, n’ont pas de préférence quant au choix de leurs tenues vestimentaires.

« Prenons l’exemple de nos parents de l’époque. En effet, tous les vêtements que nous portons aujourd’hui étaient à la mode dans le temps. Mais ne ils ne les ont pas dégradés comme c’est le cas aujourd’hui. Ils étaient des modèles. Pourquoi donc, ne pas suivre leur exemple plutôt que de participer à sa perdition. On peut être à la mode avec les vêtements en vogue, et ce sans s’adonner forcement à des’’ spectacles’’ qui ternissent notre image, voire notre dignité. On est beaux que lorsqu’on est vêtu dans la simplicité », conseille-t-elle.

Pis, les populations semblent s’accommoder avec cette nouvelle tendance que d’aucuns mettent sous le compte de la mode avec l’influence des medias et autres telenovas. « C’est l’influence des films brésiliens qui inondent nos télévisions que nos enfants copient sans s’interroger sur le fait que nos coutumes sont différentes et que la télé est différente de la réalité », relève Boubacar Sonko, analyste sénégalais.

Pour lui, il y a lieu de mettre de l’ordre dans les programmes de télévision afin de faciliter l’éducation des enfants. On se demande bien où est passée la police des mœurs ou encore le ministère de la famille, de l’enfant et de la femme face à ce phénomène.

Le ministère de la famille, faut-il le rappeler, a commencé à fermer des bars dans les rues d’Abidjan ; En attendant, des jeunes gens ont décidé de se faire les justiciers pour contraindre les jeunes filles à mieux s’habiller. A la mairie d’Abobo ou à Adjamé-Liberté, plusieurs jeunes filles ont déjà été mises totalement nues par des jeunes gens surexcités. « Puisqu’elles veulent se promener nues, nous les aidons dans ce sens. », se défendent-ils après chaque forfait.

Aloyse Kouao (stagiaire)

Source : Le Sursaut

About admin

23 comments

  1. Naturelles, A l’aise, SANS stupides Tabous ou Complexes (nous sommes en 2020 )

  2. I think the key players in the ABC (technically not being complete dolts) are well aware of what’s about to unfold. After all, the extremely likely outcome is that after less than all of day 1, a 7-0 decision to hear the matter will clear the courts throat. Then after day 2 ends -and probably early- anything from an hour’s recess later (OK that IS unlikely but not impossible given the nature of this case and if they are all in agreement), to perhaps a delay of a few days or a week, for the HC to then come down with a 7-0 finding in favour of acquittal. Virtually an instant release – yet what is on the telly? The High court may take quite some time to publish their reasons but that would not justify delay in their decision. Less than a 7-0 majority would not take much longer to see Pell released anyway. Having reviewed what’s to go before the High Court I find it extremely hard to contemplate less than a unanimous acquittal. When the Victorian Appeals Court delayed I got worried and they had no justification to NOT drag it out -so that Weinberg could do them slowly as he published his crushing reasons alongside the majority. He just crucified the majority. BUT he has done that; it was all over then! When a fair minded person reads the two sets of reasons well… with the very greatest of respect (as they say when they have none) the majority ‘know not their arse from their elbows’ and it showed. It’s not something that one has to agonize over like the Pell haters are pretending. It won’t make sense in this case to be in any losing minority. It did for Weinberg, but if you take a long time to make a fool of yourself well what can you do… 4-3 in Pell’s favour would be a shocking outcome. It would cry out on its face as loud as I could want that the laws and the courts that are being so revealed required reform. But Pell would be free and the Catholics and supporters of justice also free to start to produce the now essential exposure documentary!I just can’t see 4-3. The HC in this case only has to spell out what the error of a majority in the lower court has been and it is compelled to do very little else. They may well want to, (I think they will) as this is an historical case but that would only delay the reasons not the release. The majority would act to release Pell and publish reasons later. The minority would look like the dolts they were when published either way! Once he is to be acquitted then the majority’s first job is to release him tout de suite. But back on planet earth… 4-3, 5-2, 6-1 what would be the point? After what has been refined by Weinberg how could 1, 2 or 3 of them say that ‘I hold these views beyond a reasonable doubt and the lower court was entitled to as well.’ The judges could guess that a documentary or a blockbuster starring Liam Neeson is coming. The film showing how it all works and how it’s impossible to have happened is coming! What will happen with their legal prestige when it has already all been spelt out? Why would you trash yourself with such a blatant blunder of an Albatross case? Having both read widely enough, people like me and the ‘Investigative journalists’ and management of the ABC are not expecting a different result. I say we all expect Pell to be released and the following is a great example of why. ‘Sufficient doubt. That doubt would be sufficient to require an acquittal if it attached to even just one essential element of the offenses charged. Justice Weinberg concluded that, “in my respectful opinion, these convictions cannot be permitted to stand. The only order that can properly be made is that the applicant be acquitted on each charge.” Indeed. And so one hopes, and perhaps dares to expect, the Australian High Court to conclude as well, some months from now.’ [Link deleted]Weinberg made the other 2 in the majority look like clowns and ‘with the very greatest of respect’ by now we ought to all know it! So REVELATION for 17 March! That is shocking. The ABC has no one that is calling this out. No one is standing up for Pell’s innocence. The ABC defenders will desperately point to Amanda Vanstone. But though I think she would agree that he is an innocent man I have seen nothing on this matter from her. 4 years ago before this case she spoke in his defence but that is not now relevant. This was a landmark case of monumental stupidity on the part of the majority. So even if as a rule I would not favour a conspiratorial approach to most matters, this latest conduct by the ABC has a real smell about it! The ABC is running REVELATION. They have not done the job they boast themselves so capable of, instead they are about to sneer at Pell’s luck in getting away with it again! They are shameless! [Link deleted] Cardinal George Pell is 100 innocent, and his defence team can and has proved that comprehensively. So have others, quite independently, including me. So I can easily see why he will win the High Court appeal 7-0 and be released almost immediately. I won’t be shocked, nor fall for the obvious line that will literally sneer out of the ABC in-crowd, like Marr, Milligan, Ferguson, Barry etc. Indeed we have already seen it with Paul Barry already sneering away. [Link deleted]Bolt made a bad blunder, and the pile on was predictable even (ungenerously) deserved, but they made a meal of it and predictably sneered at his apology as well! The ABC got their weapon and used it and as Barry said at the end… if Pell wins, watch this space for ‘Bolt to go on the attack’. As if the ABC is not neck deep in this vicious attack on Pell and as if any fair minded person could do other than go on the attack against the ABC. Bolt and Henderson will go on the attack and it will be correct to do so. But what will that attack amount to? How long until it blows itself out? The problem is the struggle to get the message out …to get to a wider audience than people normally get to. They currently have an audience who largely hold the same view already! The problem is to get to the ABC audience that the usual suspects are guarding access to so effectively preventing balanced access! They have the 1+ billion dollar clout! They can keep the flow of anti Catholic hysteria going even as Pell is winning. I’d be very surprised is they didn’t hedge their bets with a couple of different potential endings for their ‘revelation’. Last minute adjustments will work just fine, after all the point is to piggy back on the Pell controversy and then swamp the Pell persecution issue.The compelling fact is that the ABC has not managed with a billion dollar budget to spot what I have for free. I was open to the thought that Pell was guilty and objectively looked at the evidence. What I did they ought to have done! They could have – through the open honest and above board enquiry methods that I have deployed and that they proclaim themselves committed to found out what both myself and the vast bulk of the legal profession already know. They could have behaved in a non biased way BUT they haven’t. Time for Ita to step up and make the board effective against their out of control management and staff. Time to bring this out of control beast to heal.ABC bias is THE issue from the start! The demand ought to be directly at the government to do something about this dangerously biased organization. It has got to the point that an obviously innocent man has gone through all this and the ABC is up to their neck in an anti-Catholic attack. Correcting the bias does not mean just the right to a little balance but given how important this is to fundamental principles it requires intervention at board level. The person who ought to lead this effort ought to be Ita Buttrose! The Morrison government ought to demand action at board level. Pell is a victim of the ABC pseudoleftist in-crowd. The demand ought to be for fair time ON the ABC! The ABC must now promote the outcome of ‘our’ investigations that have necessarily gone further than the High Court that will only find not guilty! We ‘others’ have found impossibility for opportunity and thus the 100 innocence of George Pell. The High Court never had that responsibility. That’s for investigative journalists to do.Instead we have the ABC! [Link deleted]/>[Link deleted]/>[Link deleted]/>They’ve kept their personal and professional lives very separate over the years but are now working together on Revelation for the first time since they met.“I have always had the view for a woman, in particular, that it’s very important that your career is considered in its own light,” says Ferguson.“Tony has his job and I have my job and they don’t need to cross-fertilise but the reason we brought him in on this project is that he is actually the best television writer I know of in Australia.“He’s a fantastic writer and filmmaker, and was so at Four Corners, and we needed that at this stage.“We worked together when we first met but haven’t for years since.“When you rang me we were just disagreeing about an interview grab in the opening of episode three, but otherwise it seems to be going ok! We try not to talk about the project after dinner, otherwise it’s hard from morning to night.”******************Here are 2 of my comments from before the lost appeal. Pell will have spent another year in jail![Link deleted]/>*********It looks like Pell will spend 3 months or more in Prison for a ‘crime’ that never had any credibility and so ought never have even gone to trial. Pell was dealing with 5 unsupported and almost self evidently preposterous accusations from 1 man. This man was previously reported as ‘not doing so well’ and from a reading of Milligan it appears that he had some level of mental health issues at the time he made the accusations.But crucially the vital change in his story is from locked to unlocked. The man either made up a story or more probably was delusional when he reported the matter to the police.The police then took many months to get a cleaned up formal statement from him.The truth was that the complainant never knew what the sacristy looked like from the inside because as a choirboy he would most probably never have been in it! The grieving mother had no reason to lie and Milligan knows this.The police knew that the complainant changed his story from crimes that supposedly took place behind locked doors to ones that happened while the doors were open!As Bolt is pointing out; the beak that has just sentenced Pell in his sentencing remarks simply said that he was compelled in his actions as a result of the Jury; reading between the lines he almost apologized for sentencing Pell, but that’s not the way that the ABC types are reporting this.BTW I’m an atheist quite hostile to any hocus-pocus. But this case is one of utter rubbish and as bad as any I have seen. The appeal will be unanimously upheld IMV.Posted by patrickmul, Thursday, 14 March 2019 1:01:35 PMWhen a case smells as bad as this one does it has clearly gone into the realm of a manifestly unsafe verdict.It is vital to recall that 2 boys were supposed to have been set upon by a Bishop in full regalia after a mass and both of them orally raped and that they then went back to singing and that they kept in contact but they never spoke of it again!What we are being asked to accept is that a person who is always after money to feed a drug habit never twigged that he had a rock solid case and a big payout coming from the Church that was regularly paying!He and his mate supposedly took no interest in the welfare of any other choir boys. They were treated in this manner but could care less about those that were to follow. Isn’t that typical of men. Only think of what?This isn’t thinking it is lunacy pure and simple.People have a duty to protect children but their minutes of trauma bring on nothing but a police beat up after a delusional accusation by one of them 20 very odd years later.It is no good hiding behind the great wisdom of our police prosecutors and a perverse verdict from a jury because we all know that it was the very same idiocy that produced Lindy’s nightmare.This case simply can’t be beyond a reasonable doubt and that is why it will be undone on appeal. But it ought never have gone to trial in the first place. The authorities knew that they were bringing a case that didn’t stack up and ABC journo Milligan knows it as well.Pell can’t be convicted of this utter rubbish and it is not just right wingers saying so. I am of the extreme left and I say this madness endangers us all.Posted by patrickmul, Thursday, 14 March 2019 3:47:46 PM

  3. I truly love your site.. Pleasant colors & theme.Did you create this amazing site yourself? Please reply back as I’m planning to create myvery own site and would like to know where you got this from orwhat the theme is named. Thank you!

  4. Thank you for your article post. Want more.

  5. Major thanks for the blog.Much thanks again. Cool.

  6. I value the article.Really looking forward to read more. Much obliged.

  7. Say, you got a nice post.Thanks Again.

  8. Very informative article.Really looking forward to read more. Much obliged.

  9. Thanks so much for the blog.Really thank you! Fantastic.

  10. Say, you got a nice blog article.Thanks Again. Cool.

  11. Wow, great blog.Thanks Again. Much obliged.

  12. I think this is a real great blog article.Really thank you!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.